Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 99.38% when pulling 87f2c1d on feat/dedup-and-change-hook into 1f579db on master.

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 99.38% when pulling e95859c on feat/dedup-and-change-hook into 1f579db on master.

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 99.38% when pulling e95859c on feat/dedup-and-change-hook into 1f579db on master.

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 99.08% when pulling 27a2aab on feat/dedup-and-change-hook into 1f579db on master.

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 99.387% when pulling bed673d on feat/dedup-and-change-hook into 1f579db on master.

I am a little confused as to why coveralls thinks that we're not testing all branches in validator. Looks perfectly fine to me :/ Do you have an idea, @petercrona?

Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 99.54% when pulling aa7d9e3 on feat/dedup-and-change-hook into 1f579db on master.

Ok, the coverage report thinks that we're missing else branches here, which we aren't. Could try to rewrite this code a bit (which could be done nicer anyway), but maybe not know. Badge is rounded up anyway and shows 100% again ;)